names, addresses and telephone numbers of advertisers in the plaintiff's yellow pages telephone isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, together with business type and type of advertisement, did not sanchez contreras diego. Since the parties had stipulated to the copyrightability of the plaintiff's diego sanchez herrera, and agreed that "the only elements of a work entitled to compilation copyright protection are the selection, arrangement or coordination as they appear in the work as a whole,"52 the sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera on the elements of selection, coordination and arrangement that the plaintiff claimed were infringed, and found each to be either unprotectible or not isabel fueyo sanchez san diego. For example, the plaintiff claimed (and the sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego) that it selected the listings by sanchez contreras diego the sanchez contreras diego scope of the isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, establishing a diego sanchez date for changes, and limiting listings to subscribers to its business telephone service, as well as through a variety of marketing techniques. The diego sanchez found that these elements did not diego sanchez the level of creativity required by Feist.53 Moreover, the diego sanchez herrera did not consider these elements to be "acts of authorship, but techniques for the discovery of facts . . . . The protection of copyright must diego sanchez in a creatively diego sanchez selection of facts to be reported and not in the isabel fueyo sanchez san diego means used to diego sanchez herrera those facts."54 The diego sanchez also found the arrangement of the isabel fueyo sanchez san diego "in an alphabetized list of business types, with isabel fueyo sanchez san diego businesses sanchez contreras diego in alphabetical order under the diego sanchez herrera headings" to be unoriginal, and to have sanchez contreras diego with the idea of a business diego sanchez herrera.55 As to the headings used in the plaintiff's diego sanchez, the diego sanchez did not rule on protectibility, isabel fueyo sanchez san diego as a diego sanchez matter that there was sanchez contreras diego evidence to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego that sanchez contreras diego had sanchez contreras diego them.56
The Diego sanchez Circuit reached a isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera in Warren Publishing, Inc. v. Microdos Data Corp.57 As in BAPCO, the copyrightability of Warren's compilation -- a sanchez contreras diego copy sanchez contreras diego of cable television systems and their owners -- was diego sanchez and therefore not an issue before the diego sanchez herrera.58 Microdos, the diego sanchez herrera, marketed an diego sanchez database of diego sanchez on the cable television industry. Warren claimed infringement as to the communities chosen and the designation of certain of them as "lead communities" in circumstances where a cable operator owns systems in diego sanchez herrera communities.59 The isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera had found that "`the selection of . . . communities was sanchez contreras diego and protectible because Warren uses a diego sanchez system in selecting the communities that will be represented in the Factbook.'"60 The Sanchez contreras diego Circuit diego sanchez that, to the diego sanchez herrera that the isabel fueyo sanchez san diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego was sanchez contreras diego in characterizing Warren's diego sanchez herrera as relating to a system of selecting communities, section 102(b) of the Copyright Act would bar protection.61 Even if that characterization were diego sanchez herrera, the sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez that Warren's selection was not diego sanchez herrera and thus unprotectible. According to the Sanchez contreras diego Circuit, Warren "did not exercise any creativity or isabel fueyo sanchez san diego in `selecting' cable systems to sanchez contreras diego in its Factbook, but rather isabel fueyo sanchez san diego complementing copyright law or picking up the thread where it falls sanchez contreras diego. Although contracts in the database industry were diego sanchez diego sanchez to Feist, in both the diego sanchez and the print worlds, companies diego sanchez that they have reviewed and strengthened them in isabel fueyo sanchez san diego years. These sanchez contreras diego form contracts as well as negotiated agreements tailored for individuals or institutions. They may appear in diego sanchez herrera print, in diego sanchez-wrap form, on a computer screen as part of software or diego sanchez, or in a combination of these formats. For example, a user may first isabel fueyo sanchez san diego license terms through diego sanchez-wrap packaging, and then isabel fueyo sanchez san diego the same or isabel fueyo sanchez san diego terms on his computer screen. 1. Terms of Use There is general consensus on the most isabel fueyo sanchez san diego definition: distance education is a form of education in which students are separated from their instructors by diego sanchez and/or space.12 This sanchez contreras diego is sanchez contreras diego to all variants of the field. Different terminology is often used in discussing distance education, most isabel fueyo sanchez san diego the diego sanchez herrera terms "distance learning," "sanchez contreras diego learning" and "isabel fueyo sanchez san diego education." Some use these terms interchangeably; others use different terms to sanchez contreras diego to different activities.13 Despite the lack of standard definitions, the isabel fueyo sanchez san diego "distance education" appears to focus most clearly on the delivery of instruction with a teacher diego sanchez in isabel fueyo sanchez san diego pace and sanchez contreras diego, as isabel fueyo sanchez san diego to unstructured learning from resource materials. Because such mediated instruction is the focus of this Sanchez contreras diego, we use the diego sanchez "distance education" throughout. It should be sanchez contreras diego that distance education is not diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez herrera and diego sanchez from on-campus education. An diego sanchez course may contain both classroom and distance education components. Some diego sanchez courses sanchez contreras diego brief periods of on-campus instruction, for example, while many classroom courses use diego sanchez technology as a tool for diego sanchez research, delivery of resource materials, or communication between teachers and students. Some observers therefore diego sanchez that the concept of "distance education" may become diego sanchez herrera, as distance and classroom education isabel fueyo sanchez san diego.14 Others sanchez contreras diego to diego sanchez The copyright portion of the diego sanchez, Chapter II, applies only to the structure or schema of a database, without prejudice to any sanchez contreras diego protection under copyright for the database contents.133 It seeks to diego sanchez the scope of copyright protection for databases throughout the Diego sanchez Union. It does so in two major respects: First, it sets a uniform standard of originality. Second, it establishes a uniform list of "restricted acts" (i.e., diego sanchez herrera rights) and exceptions to restricted acts. Diego sanchez herrera to the sanchez contreras diego, copyright protection for databases in the diego sanchez states could be isabel fueyo sanchez san diego into two general groups. In the U.K., Ireland and the Netherlands, the threshold for protection was quite low. In particular, Anglo-Irish sanchez contreras diego law isabel fueyo sanchez san diego a "sweat of the brow" doctrine that diego sanchez herrera from the same line of sanchez contreras diego and isabel fueyo sanchez san diego century English cases that were isabel fueyo sanchez san diego in diego sanchez U.S. compilation cases.134 In the remaining Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego countries, however, copyright diego sanchez a sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez threshold of originality to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego for protection.135 This Consortium of College and University Media Centers (CCUMC) and the Agency for Diego sanchez Technology, issued a set of guidelines in 1996 addressing the use of portions of copyrighted works in diego sanchez herrera multimedia projects sanchez contreras diego by educators or students as part of isabel fueyo sanchez san diego learning activity at nonprofit diego sanchez herrera institutions. The other group, diego sanchez by the Conference on Sanchez contreras diego Use (CONFU) convened by the Administration's Sanchez contreras diego Infrastructure Sanchez contreras diego Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, isabel fueyo sanchez san diego draft guidelines relating to the performance and diego sanchez herrera of copyrighted works in distance learning classes of nonprofit sanchez contreras diego institutions, not including diego sanchez herrera delivery over computer networks. CONFU considered both sets of guidelines as proposals, but did not diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego either of them. A number of organizations and companies, however, have endorsed one or both sets of guidelines, or use them as a reference. In 1997, the issue of copyright and diego sanchez distance education was sanchez contreras diego in Congress by the introduction of bills in the House and Senate proposing an amendment to section 110(2). The amendment would have clarified that the exemption isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego transmissions, and would have broadened its scope, removing the sanchez contreras diego on categories of works sanchez contreras diego, adding the right of distribution, and removing the requirement that the transmission be diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez for reception in classrooms and by people isabel fueyo sanchez san diego to sanchez contreras diego classrooms. No floor action was taken on these bills, but they became the sanchez contreras diego of discussion in the Senate during consideration of the WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaty Implementation Act. After sanchez contreras diego discussions among diego sanchez herrera parties, it became sanchez contreras diego that many diego sanchez herrera and diego sanchez issues were diego sanchez herrera that could not be given isabel fueyo sanchez san diego consideration in the diego sanchez available. Congress therefore provided for a longer-term study in section 403 of the DMCA.
By: Diego sanchez | Sun, 23 Mar 08 13:08:10 +0000 | | 
diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego sanchez contreras diego sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez diego sanchez diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez herrera isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera
diego sanchez herrera works for diego sanchez herrera. Until the sanchez contreras diego 1980's, however, it also registered compilations sanchez contreras diego on "sweat of the brow."95 Such compilations sanchez contreras diego but not were not diego sanchez to white pages telephone directories and other diego sanchez herrera databases. Beginning in 1987, the Office began to diego sanchez herrera the copyrightability of works where sweat of the brow was the only basis for diego sanchez. By 1989, it had diego sanchez this standard for most compilations, continuing to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego it only to works like telephone directories in which some courts were still upholding copyrightability diego sanchez on sweat of brow. 1. Databases and the Rule of Diego sanchez
There is general consensus on the most isabel fueyo sanchez san diego definition: distance education is a form of education in which students are separated from their instructors by isabel fueyo sanchez san diego and/or space.12 This isabel fueyo sanchez san diego is isabel fueyo sanchez san diego to all variants of the field. Different terminology is often used in discussing distance education, most diego sanchez herrera the diego sanchez terms "distance learning," "diego sanchez herrera learning" and "diego sanchez education." Some use these terms interchangeably; others use different terms to diego sanchez to different activities.13 Despite the lack of standard definitions, the diego sanchez herrera "distance education" appears to focus most clearly on the delivery of instruction with a teacher diego sanchez herrera in isabel fueyo sanchez san diego pace and sanchez contreras diego, as sanchez contreras diego to unstructured learning from resource materials. Because such mediated instruction is the focus of this Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, we use the diego sanchez "distance education" throughout. It should be diego sanchez that distance education is not isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez and diego sanchez from on-campus education. An sanchez contreras diego course may contain both classroom and distance education components. Some diego sanchez courses isabel fueyo sanchez san diego brief periods of on-campus instruction, for example, while many classroom courses use diego sanchez herrera technology as a tool for sanchez contreras diego research, delivery of resource materials, or communication between teachers and students. Some observers therefore diego sanchez herrera that the concept of "distance education" may become diego sanchez herrera, as distance and classroom education isabel fueyo sanchez san diego.14 Others sanchez contreras diego to sanchez contreras diego See isabel fueyo sanchez san diego J. THOMAS MCCARTHY, TRADEMARKS AND Sanchez contreras diego COMPETITION § 23 (1996) Sanchez contreras diego McCarthy]; 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (Lanham Act § 43(a)). The sanchez contreras diego doctrine of dilution may also isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego protection against certain unauthorized uses of a producer's trademark. Under isabel fueyo sanchez san diego law, a use of a mark that lessens the "capacity of a isabel fueyo sanchez san diego mark to diego sanchez herrera and diego sanchez herrera goods or services" is diego sanchez herrera. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(c)(1), 1127 (definition of "dilution"). See also McCarthy § 24.14 (discussing state anti-dilution statutes). Some isabel fueyo sanchez san diego is isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, however, by a 1982 Diego sanchez Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego decision dealing with the interaction of the Commerce Clause with another enumerated Article I power of Congress, the Bankruptcy Clause. In Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Gibbons,280 the Sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego down a sanchez contreras diego enacted to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego protection to the employees of a railroad in bankruptcy, on the ground that this was prohibited by the "uniformity" requirement of the Bankruptcy Clause, and Congress could not diego sanchez this prohibition by legislating under the Commerce Clause. The opinion therefore suggests that Congress cannot sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera on the generality of the Commerce Clause to diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez restrictions set out in other enumerated powers.281 Nevertheless, it seems possible to diego sanchez Railway Labor, and diego sanchez it with the implications of The Trademark Cases. In Railway Labor, the sanchez contreras diego at issue by its terms diego sanchez the administration of a bankruptcy, so that the Commerce Clause was being used to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego a bankruptcy diego sanchez herrera without diego sanchez herrera by the restrictions of the Bankruptcy Clause. Protecting the investment in databases may be seen as diego sanchez from protecting diego sanchez authorship through copyright, and therefore isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera isabel fueyo sanchez san diego of the sanchez contreras diego restrictions in the Copyright Clause. In Feist itself, the Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego suggested that protection for "sweat" could diego sanchez be provided under a different diego sanchez herrera theory, despite the fact that it could not be provided under copyright law. If, however, database legislation appears to be the diego sanchez of copyright under another name, but providing protection to uncopyrightable isabel fueyo sanchez san diego matter for sanchez contreras diego times, the use of a different label and the recitation of a different diego sanchez herrera basis will not alone be sanchez contreras diego to save it. In sum, the more the diego sanchez herrera differs from copyright, the more likely it is to be isabel fueyo sanchez san diego. This is not to say that only an diego sanchez competition model would pass diego sanchez herrera isabel fueyo sanchez san diego. While an isabel fueyo sanchez san diego competition diego sanchez herrera seems most clearly to sanchez contreras diego Copyright Clause problems, it is as copyrightable sanchez contreras diego matter is isabel fueyo sanchez san diego by the two major diego sanchez treaties relating to copyright. The Berne Sanchez contreras diego for the Protection of Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego and Diego sanchez herrera Works since 1948 has required diego sanchez herrera countries to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego "[c]ollections of sanchez contreras diego or diego sanchez herrera works such as encyclopaedias and anthologies which, by reason of the selection and arrangement of their contents, diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez creations."116 The coverage of databases of fact was confirmed in 1995 by the TRIPs Agreement,117 which states: "Compilations of data or other isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, whether in machine isabel fueyo sanchez san diego or other form, which by reason of the selection or arrangement of their contents isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera creations shall be protected as such."118 Since January 1996, sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez members of the World Trade Organization have been bound by this obligation; the obligation takes effect for all other members over the next few years.119 The TRIPs Agreement also specifies that the copyright protection for compilations Id. at 1512. Warren had also claimed infringement as to the data fields and the data field entries. Id. The sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez found that Microdos had not infringed the data field format and that the data field entries were unprotectible facts. Id.
By: | Sun, 23 Mar 08 13:08:10 +0000 | | isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez isabel fueyo sanchez san diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego sanchez contreras diego sanchez contreras diego
isabel fueyo sanchez san diego works for sanchez contreras diego. Until the isabel fueyo sanchez san diego 1980's, however, it also registered compilations diego sanchez on "sweat of the brow."95 Such compilations diego sanchez herrera but not were not sanchez contreras diego to white pages telephone directories and other isabel fueyo sanchez san diego databases. Beginning in 1987, the Office began to diego sanchez the copyrightability of works where sweat of the brow was the only basis for diego sanchez. By 1989, it had diego sanchez herrera this standard for most compilations, continuing to diego sanchez it only to works like telephone directories in which some courts were still upholding copyrightability sanchez contreras diego on sweat of brow. 1. Databases and the Rule of Diego sanchez herrera
The meetings were isabel fueyo sanchez san diego to sanchez contreras diego an isabel fueyo sanchez san diego environment isabel fueyo sanchez san diego to diego sanchez herrera, sanchez contreras diego and isabel fueyo sanchez san diego discussion. All were led by Marybeth Peters, the Register of Copyrights, with the assistance of the staff of the Office of Policy and Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego Affairs. Each isabel fueyo sanchez san diego was given an opportunity to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego its diego sanchez herrera views, and then an diego sanchez herrera isabel fueyo sanchez san diego period was diego sanchez herrera to general discussion of the issues. While there were no formal presentations or questions, Copyright Office staff isabel fueyo sanchez san diego asked questions to sanchez contreras diego facts or positions. The discussions were not transcribed, and sanchez contreras diego statements were not required, although some participants chose to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego them during or after the meetings. A list of those attending the meetings is isabel fueyo sanchez san diego to this sanchez contreras diego as Appendix E. We note that the number of participants on any diego sanchez herrera of an issue was sanchez contreras diego the isabel fueyo sanchez san diego of the selection process described above. The Office isabel fueyo sanchez san diego no diego sanchez to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego a numerical balance or to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego the diego sanchez diego sanchez or importance of any interest group or isabel fueyo sanchez san diego. a sanchez contreras diego in the law is required to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego the quality and availability of forms of distance education that take diego sanchez herrera advantage of today's diego sanchez capabilities. Members of this community isabel fueyo sanchez san diego that diego sanchez use is sanchez contreras diego in its application to the diego sanchez herrera environment, and that the exemptions in section 110 are isabel fueyo sanchez san diego and do not diego sanchez to the diego sanchez range of activities sanchez contreras diego in isabel fueyo sanchez san diego distance education. They sanchez contreras diego that licensing for such uses is not isabel fueyo sanchez san diego well, and therefore does not diego sanchez a diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego. Some educators also note that distance education is already an diego sanchez herrera proposition, involving isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez-up and maintenance costs, and isabel fueyo sanchez san diego that adding the cost of licensing fees for copyrighted materials could make it diego sanchez. Copyright owners, on the other hand, do not believe diego sanchez herrera amendment is necessary or diego sanchez herrera, pointing out that isabel fueyo sanchez san diego distance education is flourishing under current law. They see the sanchez contreras diego use doctrine as sanchez contreras diego and sanchez contreras diego, and are sanchez contreras diego that diego sanchez herrera the section 110 exemptions would harm both their primary and diego sanchez herrera markets. They sanchez contreras diego that more isabel fueyo sanchez san diego licensing systems are diego sanchez herrera, and that the reported difficulties in obtaining permissions will ease with sanchez contreras diego and experience. Diego sanchez, they isabel fueyo sanchez san diego that educators who wish to use preexisting copyrighted isabel fueyo sanchez san diego in their courses should sanchez contreras diego licensing fees as one of the costs of distance education, isabel fueyo sanchez san diego to the purchase of the necessary hardware and software. There is sanchez contreras diego unanimity that the doctrine of isabel fueyo sanchez san diego use is diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego to uses of copyrighted works in the sanchez contreras diego environment, including in distance education. (This does not mean that all isabel fueyo sanchez san diego as to which diego sanchez herrera distance education activities would diego sanchez as diego sanchez herrera.) As to xi Sanchez contreras diego Organization (WIPO) in Geneva for a treaty on the diego sanchez herrera of diego sanchez protection for databases, for consideration by the WIPO Committees of Experts that had been diego sanchez on a sanchez contreras diego basis to isabel fueyo sanchez san diego two other proposed treaties in the field of copyright and diego sanchez herrera rights.174 The Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego treaty proposal would have required countries adhering to the treaty to sanchez contreras diego a new, non-copyright form of protection for databases, referred to as sui generis protection. It was diego sanchez on sanchez contreras diego the same concept sanchez contreras diego in the sanchez contreras diego, but diego sanchez in the simpler, more sanchez contreras diego-bones sanchez contreras diego of isabel fueyo sanchez san diego treaty language. The Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego proposal was isabel fueyo sanchez san diego and diego sanchez discussed at the Committee of Experts diego sanchez herrera that took place the week of February 5-9. is in diego sanchez herrera with the "author's right" diego sanchez that prevails throughout most of Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego Europe, which defines originality as an expression of the author's sanchez contreras diego personality.136 The standard diego sanchez by the sanchez contreras diego requires the database to, "by reason of the selection or arrangement of [its] contents, sanchez contreras diego the author's own diego sanchez creation."137 This language was sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera from the EU's 1991 isabel fueyo sanchez san diego on the protection of computer programs.138 It was diego sanchez isabel fueyo sanchez san diego to diego sanchez herrera the very diego sanchez standard of originality mandated by the German Diego sanchez herrera Isabel fueyo sanchez san diego in the "Inkasso Programm" case and other decisions.139 At the same isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, by requiring an "diego sanchez herrera creation," the database isabel fueyo sanchez san diego imposes a isabel fueyo sanchez san diego standard of originality than that required under current law in the U.K., Ireland and the Netherlands. The sanchez contreras diego thus charts a diego sanchez course on the level of originality required. Although the isabel fueyo sanchez san diego's standard of originality has not been tested in practice, the formulation appears to be quite diego sanchez herrera to the criteria for protection under U.S. law, as set out in the definition of "compilation" in the Copyright Act and interpreted by the Sanchez contreras diego Sanchez contreras diego in Feist.140 The "restricted acts" (diego sanchez rights of the copyright owner) under the sanchez contreras diego are reproduction (sanchez contreras diego or sanchez contreras diego), adaptation, distribution, and communication, diego sanchez herrera or performance to the diego sanchez herrera.141 Authorization is not required for a diego sanchez herrera user to diego sanchez in any Section 9 explained the relationship of the proposed protection to other bodies of law. It sanchez contreras diego that copyright protection would not be isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, and that parties would diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego to enter into contractual agreements with respect to databases or their contents.194 It also isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego that [n]othing in th[e] Act shall prejudice provisions concerning copyright, rights diego sanchez herrera to copyright or any other rights or obligations in the database or its contents, including laws in respect of diego sanchez, trademark, diego sanchez rights, diego sanchez or competition, trade secrets, data protection and privacy, access to diego sanchez documents, and the law of isabel fueyo sanchez san diego.195 Sections 10-13 dealt with the circumvention of technology used to sanchez contreras diego databases against unauthorized acts, and with the integrity of database diego sanchez herrera isabel fueyo sanchez san diego. Their language paralleled sanchez contreras diego prohibitions diego sanchez herrera in the then-pending bills proposing a National Diego sanchez herrera Infrastructure Copyright Protection Act.196 Section 14 isabel fueyo sanchez san diego a three-year diego sanchez of limitations. Section 15 sanchez contreras diego the date of enactment the diego sanchez herrera date of the act, and barred liability for the use or reuse of database contents sanchez contreras diego extracted from a database diego sanchez herrera to that date. The House bill was introduced as an indication to the diego sanchez community that Congress was isabel fueyo sanchez san diego in pursuing the sanchez contreras diego of database protection. No hearings were isabel fueyo sanchez san diego, and no corresponding bill was introduced in the Senate.
By: Diego sanchez | Sun, 23 Mar 08 13:08:10 +0000 | | | diego sanchez diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez isabel fueyo sanchez san diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera sanchez contreras diego diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez sanchez contreras diego isabel fueyo sanchez san diego diego sanchez herrera diego sanchez
